1. What concept, guaranteed by the constituation, proves social media’s concept of having to prove your innocense is wrong?
2. Why is it easier to prove that you have been to Walmart as opposed to proving you have never been to Walmart? Explain your answer.
3. If I accuse you of stealing my TV, do you have to prove you didn’t take it or do I have to prove you did take it? Which way makes more sense? Explain your answer.
4. In our criminal justice system, why is the accuser not allowed to remain anonymous?
5. What amendment to the U.S. Constitution allows the accused to confront their accuser? What does the amendment specifically say?
6. Why is the right to confront your accuser a fundamental right?
7. How has today’s social media similar to Salem Witch Trials?

3 comments on “Social media’s concept of having to prove your innocense is wrong

  1. Pingback: stapelstein

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *