• Welcome To Perfect Grade
Order Now

Ethical dilemma

  • April 19, 2021
  • Manyara2021
  • 263

You are serving on a jury for a murder trial. The evidence presented at trial was largely circumstantial and, in your mind, equivocal. During closing, the prosecutor argues that you must find the defendant guilty because he confessed to the crime. The defense attorney immediately objects, and the judge sternly instructs the jury to disregard the prosecutor’s statement. Although you do not know exactly what happened, you suspect that the confession was excluded because of some procedural error. Would you be able to ignore the prosecutor’s statement in your deliberations? Should you? Would you tell the judge if the jury members discussed the statement and seemed to be influenced by it?
 

Tags:

263 comments on “Ethical dilemma”

  1. I have read your article carefully and I agree with you very much. So, do you allow me to do this? I want to share your article link to my website: Sign Up

  54. To announce actual news, adhere to these tips:

    Look in behalf of credible sources: https://apexlifestyle.co.uk/statamic/bundles/pags/?news-brought-by-balthasar-to-romeo.html. It’s important to ensure that the newscast source you are reading is reputable and unbiased. Some examples of reliable sources subsume BBC, Reuters, and The Different York Times. Review multiple sources to stimulate a well-rounded aspect of a isolated low-down event. This can better you listen to a more ideal display and keep bias. Be in the know of the angle the article is coming from, as flush with respectable news sources can have bias. Fact-check the information with another commencement if a news article seems too sensational or unbelievable. Always pass sure you are reading a advised article, as news can change-over quickly.

    Nearby following these tips, you can evolve into a more in the know scandal reader and more wisely be aware the cosmos about you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *